On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 01:07:34PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > I am now preparing an updated package that makes ghostscript depend on > gs-common >= 8.62.dfsg.1-3.1.
> @Niko: you mention that this would cause a circular dependency. I > believe that is not the case when the dependency is versioned and newer > than the versioned conflict. If I misunderstood, then please elaborate. The circular dependency I was referring to is that gs-common already depends on (unversioned) ghostscript, and this introduces the other direction. I'm not sure if that is a problem at all, probably not. -- Niko Tyni [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
