* CJ van den Berg [Sun, 02 Nov 2008 23:00:01 +0100]:
Hello, thanks for the reply.
> On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 02:54:25PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > I won't insist that this package should be removed from unstable,
> > because maybe development on it starts again -- should that happen, then
> > we can stop shipping libao-pulse in libao2, and Suggest/Recommend
> > libao-pulse instead.
> > However, it is clear that is not going to happen for Lenny, and as
> > things stand now we're shipping two copies of the same code, which is
> > not good. If you don't disagree, I would like to remove libao-pulse from
> > Lenny, and leave this RC bug open until libao-pulse development starts
> > again.
> > How does that sound to you?
> That’s absolutely fine with me. Although I would close the bug too, as I
> don’t expect libao-pulse development to ever start up again.
Ok, good, I'll remove the package from testing then. Regarding closing
the bug, it should not be closed as long as libao-pulse is in unstable,
to prevent it from migrating to testing again.
If, as you say, you don't expect development to resume, maybe the
package should be removed from unstable altogether. What do you think?
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
If you want the holes in your knowledge showing up try teaching someone.
-- Alan Cox
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
