On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 07:18:49AM +0000, Hideki Yamane wrote: > On Sat, 18 Oct 2008 17:55:29 +0200 > Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It is likely to _not_ be a tokyocabinet bug but a libc one. > > > > > > According to http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=tokyocabinet > > > tokyocabinet > > > has been built on s390 now: > > > > > > s390 1.2.1-1 Installed 2008 > > > Oct 16 11:54:52 > > > > > > Has this been fixed by changes inside glibc? Can this bug be closed? > > > > Not that I'm aware of (with my glibc-packager hat on). > > That sounds good thing! :) > # and apologize to you for making some noise. > > > And is there any porter machine for non-DD (upstream)?
Not that I'm aware of, and it's probably a bug in s390 assembly, and actually not a tokyocabinet bug _at all_. So unless upstream knows s390 assembly... I don't think he can help a lot :) -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgpSD5XzWewoE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
