On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:45:06AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > I can live without knowing why the code needs to run in that address; but > I'm still puzzled by how is the code supposed to tell the assembler that the > 0x7ea9 chunk really should be saved to 0x4f. We can't remove my ad-hoc hack > without knowing that....
Ok I just found a solution that is much more reasonable. When the offset exceeds 0x7000, we just add 1 word (3 bytes) to the previous one. It's still an ugly hack, but I believe it's not ad-hoc to this particular code. And by far it's much better than what we have now :-P -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
