Len Sorensen ha scritto: > Well if it isn't being accepted into Lenny, then that doesn't help and > most likely Lenny will end up with no procinfo at all. > > Wouldn't it be better to make a procinfo 18-3 with the simple fix which > is much more likely to be accepted into Lenny and then get the new > procinfo-ng into the next major release? > > A fixed package for etch would be nice too given it is a rather serious > bug. >
I prepared an upload for tpu, and I'm waiting an ack from release-team [0] You can find a preliminary package for lenny [1], let me know if it fixes this issue. [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2008/10/msg00662.html [1] http://ctu.iuculano.it/procinfo-lenny/ Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
