Michael Hanke wrote: > Hi, > > [CC'ing my sponsor] > > On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 07:56:59PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: >> Hi >> >> Please backport the fix for this bug to lenny and upload to >> testing-proposed-updates, TIA. >> >> If you think it's not possible to backport the fix and it would be >> better to remove fsl and fslview from lenny, please let me know. > I don't think that it is necessary to remove fsl from the archive. > Actually, all RC bugs present in the lenny version (#474447, #494340 and > #475993) have been fixed some time ago. > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=494340#20 > > There is a problem on ARM the let's uic-qt3 segfault: > > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=fslview&ver=3.0.2%2B4.1.0-1&arch=arm&stamp=1222355159&file=log > > This prevented (and still prevents) fslview from moving into testing. I > have tagged the bug with 'help', but got none so far. > I have no clue what could cause such behavior. AFAIK uic simply > generates the sources that will later on be compiled. If it works on one > platform it should work on others. > > Nevertheless, the package that contains all the fixes for the upstream > version that is in lenny is still in the archive (in some sense this is > now a backport): > > http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/f/fslview/fslview_3.0+4.0.2-5.dsc > > Do you want me to prepare an upload of this package to tpu or can it be > hinted in an automatic fashion, despite the fact that binary packages > for most archs would have to be rebuilt and despite the fact that it > probably won't build on ARM?
Well, if the arm build failure would be fixed, that's indeed the way forward (albeit with a different version number). Did you contact the arm porters and/or the maintainers of qt4-x11 to see if they have ideas about why uic segfaults on arm and how to fix it? Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
