Le mardi 07 octobre 2008 à 12:48 +1100, Ben Finney a écrit : > Yes, we do need more detail; we need to know that *any* recipient of > Debian can redistribute the work to anyone else, modified or > unmodified, commercially or otherwise. (Or to know that these actions > are not allowed, so that we can remove the package from Debian.)
As for the "modified or unmodified", I think we have already considered it acceptable to require a name change for significant modifications made by third-party distributors. For example, though I’m not sure, I think this is already the case for Apache. I’ll ask for clarifications about the rest. Cheers, -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
