On 2008-09-26 23:08 +0200, Joerg Schuetter wrote: > Could the portmap issue be caused by the missing K??portmap symlink > in rc1.d? By running "update-rc.d -f portmap remove" and then the command > "update-rc.d portmap start 43 S . start 32 0 6 . stop 81 1 ." > from the postinst-file the required stop script is in rc1.d.
Note the bug report is about runlevel 0, not 1. "Start" scripts in runlevel 0 and 6 are special, they are called with a stop argument. > To prevent tampering to much with these links it could be split up in > for single steps. This makes sure the link in rc1.d will be created even > if the creation of the other links failed (since already existing with a > different strt number). In my "grown" system I already had a few links to > portmap, so it was not possible to add new ones. If in any runlevel a link already exists, update-rc.d will not create new ones, true. That ensures local modifications are preserved. This does not explain why portmap isn't stopped _despite_ the link in runlevel 0 exists. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
