On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 12:21:57AM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 10:34:53PM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Ana Guerrero schrieb:
> > > DEBIAN_WXFLAVOUR := $(shell pwd | sed -e '[EMAIL
> > > PROTECTED]/wxwidgets[0-9.]\+-\?\(.*\)[EMAIL PROTECTED]@')
> > [..]
> > > Ideal fix would be fixing the whole debian/rules, but given the release
> > > time
> > > we are it is not good idea make big changes in the package. I gould go
> > > for the
> > > quick solution and keep the package how it is working currently...
> > > Anyway, I guess this version of wxwidgets is meant to dissapear post
> > > lenny?
> >
> > Did you see Matt Kraai fix for #489077? Seems to be the same Problem,
> > and his fix is a oneliner, just changing how the content of that
> > variable is generated.
> >
> > Should work here, too.
>
> I did not fully read that bug report, but yes the second problem listed there
> is the same. That fix will work as well because it creates an empty
> DEBIAN_WXFLAVOUR value, if you still keep a build log of your upload, please
> check if the options: --with-flavour= are followed by something. (My guess is
> they don't)
>
I just took a look to the amd64 buildd upload of your NMU [1] and
DEBIAN_WXFLAVOUR does not take a value with this solution either.
You just can check in the debian/rules that the lines that contains:
--with-flavour=$(DEBIAN_WXFLAVOUR) \
are replaced by:
--with-flavour=
in the buildd log :)
Actually, this worked as expected (generating the "flavour" string) before
patching it when using sbuild, it is just the rest of the rules is wrong.
My patch is meant to be a work around instead of change the rest of the
debian/rules that is what it should be done.
Still, Ron, what do you think of this?
And by the way, my fix is oneliner too !=)
Ana
[1]
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=wxwidgets2.8;ver=2.8.7.1-1.1;arch=amd64;stamp=1220833694
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
