Hi, I'm sending the information that I was asked on IRC (a report on when each of the violations were first known in Debian).
There are two meta-bugs, #242866 and #383403, which grouped several violations, and were closed by the maintainers a while ago, arguing that separate bugs for each violation should be filed instead (see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=242866#308). As for the bugs I filed, here are my findings: Known since 9 Apr 2004 (due to #242866 meta-bug): #493925 (drivers/char/drm/mga_ucode.h) #494007 (drivers/char/drm/r128_cce.c) #494308 (drivers/net/e100.c) (Note: the first reply in #494308 further indicates the problem was known before I filed it) Known since 16 Aug 2006 (due to #383403 meta-bug): #494010 (drivers/char/dsp56k.c) Do not appear to be known before my reports: #494009 (drivers/char/drm/radeon_microcode.h) #494119 (drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/af9005-script.h) #494120 (drivers/media/dvb/frontends/tda10021.c) #494122 (drivers/media/dvb/frontends/tda8083.c) -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
