Hi Peter! On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:36:11 +0200, Peter De Wachter wrote: > On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 01:08:53 +0200 > Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > - utilities.lisp doesn't have an IN-PACKAGE form, so it gets loaded >> > in whatever random package happens to be active. >> >> Since it's loaded by all the three subsystems, I'd say it's correct. > > Well, consider this transcript: [...] > Utilities.lisp clobbers variables and functions in whatever package the > user happened to be in, that can't be right. And re-loading the > geodesics fasls won't work if that :foo package no longer exists.
OK, now I understood what you meant, fixed [1]. >> I guess the idea was to having to load only one system instead of >> three. It can also be possible to split geodesics.asd in three >> different files, one for each subsystem, still providing the old >> geodesics.asd which loads the three. > > But those three systems define functions with the exact same names: > geodesics:a > geodesics:da/dt > geodesics:adash > geodesics:n > geodesics:dn/dt > geodesics:ndash > If you load GD-STATIC-UNEQUAL after GD-STATIC-EQUAL, you'll redefine > GD-STATIC-EQUAL's functions. If you next load GD-COSMOLOGICAL, you'll > just redefine them again. A system that loads more than one of these > three is nonsensical. I committed the split [2], but I kept geodesics.asd for backward compatibility. However, we still have only one package, GEODESICS: should each system define their own package? Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca Footnotes: [1] http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-common-lisp/cl-geodesics.git;a=commitdiff;h=09db012a40ac704ad6b54b8b7c3047e89caa7123 [2] http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-common-lisp/cl-geodesics.git;a=commitdiff;h=8915755ac6b198502312789a11c4d335e50064c1
pgpgp3hDdVG44.pgp
Description: PGP signature