Your message dated Wed, 03 Sep 2008 23:45:45 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: status of refpolicy? has caused the Debian Bug report #386168, regarding fails to configure when the running kernel has no SELinux support to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately.) -- 386168: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=386168 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: selinux-policy-default Version: 1:1.26-7 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This packes fails to install on recent sid (kernel 2.6.17-2-686), I dont enabled selinux yet, so mayby this is a problem. First i install selinux-basics (See DBTS #386161), then according to README (BTW. There is a typo ~> grep NOTE /usr/share/doc/selinux-basics/README NOTE: You will still need a policy, e.g. the selinux-polixy-default package. ^ ) i installed selinux-policy-default. After accepting all rules there was error: ... Installing the new SE Linux policy mount: unknown filesystem type 'selinuxfs' dpkg: błąd przetwarzania selinux-policy-default (--configure): podproces post-installation script zwrócił kod błędu 32 Wystąpiły błędy podczas przetwarzania: selinux-policy-default E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/baryluk# [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/baryluk# cat /proc/filesystems nodev sysfs nodev rootfs nodev bdev nodev proc nodev securityfs <- mayby this? nodev sockfs nodev pipefs nodev futexfs nodev tmpfs nodev inotifyfs nodev eventpollfs nodev devpts cramfs nodev ramfs nodev mqueue nodev usbfs ext3 nodev fuse nodev binfmt_misc [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/baryluk# grep selinux /etc/fstab none /selinux selinuxfs noauto 0 0 directory was automaticly created, but script should check, if selinix is enabled, and selinuxfs file system is avaible. dmesg say now: SELinux: Disabled at boot. When i'm trying to continue installation (repeating apt-get install selinux-policy-default), it's going even worse: ... Konfigurowanie selinux-policy-default (1.26-7) ... cat: /selinux/policyvers: Nie ma takiego pliku ani katalogu [<- no such file or directory] Building policy.conf ... Compiling policy ... policyvers value 0 not in range 15-20 usage: /usr/bin/checkpolicy [-b] [-d] [-M] [-c policyvers (15-20)] [-o output_file] [input_file] make: *** [/etc/selinux/./policy/policy.] Błąd 1 dpkg: błąd przetwarzania selinux-policy-default (--configure): podproces post-installation script zwrócił kod błędu 2 Wystąpiły błędy podczas przetwarzania: selinux-policy-default E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/baryluk# -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to pl_PL.UTF-8) Versions of packages selinux-policy-default depends on: ii checkpolicy 1.30.10-2 SELinux policy compiler ii libpam-modules 0.79-3.2 Pluggable Authentication Modules f ii libselinux1 1.30.26-2 SELinux shared libraries ii m4 1.4.6-1 a macro processing language ii make 3.81-2 The GNU version of the "make" util ii policycoreutils 1.30.26-3 SELinux core policy utilities ii python 2.4.3-11 An interactive high-level object-o selinux-policy-default recommends no packages. -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 2:0.0.20080702-1 On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 23:19:27 +0200, Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > 386168 fails to configure when the running kernel has no SELinux > support This is a binary package that was produced from a different source package. There is no indication that the current default policy fails to configure for machines where selinux is not enabled. > 390648 FTBFS: will not create hard link This refers to a binary created by the old, now obsolete, version of the package. That version was not created from the refpolicy source package, and used debhelper, which the new versions do not. > 431944 selinux-policy-default: fails to install: prompts for config > change Same here. This is not relevant for the new selinux-policy-default package. > in between the bugs, there are mentions of refpolicy being obsolete, > but that information might itself be obsolete given that Russel > updated the package quite recently. > Can any of you shed some light on the status of these bugs and, in > particular, the question of obsoleteness? The binary package went through a period of being deprecated, and now has been resurrected, from a different source package. I'll look into the other bugs on these packages (the non-RC ones) manoj -- Women who want to be equal to men lack imagination. Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--- End Message ---
