Your message dated Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:29:33 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ov511 has been removed from Debian, closing #493262
has caused the Debian Bug report #493262,
regarding ov511-source: Obsolete driver?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
493262: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=493262
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ov511-source
Version: Obsolete package?
Severity: serious

ov511 hasn't been uploaded since 2006-11-01 and there's a bug report that
it fails to compile with 2.6.19 and 2.6.22. (And very likely with current
kernels, but I haven't tried it myself)

I'm filing this bug since ov511 has been merged into the regular kernel
and is prevent in current kernel images:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -L linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 | grep ov511
/lib/modules/2.6.26-1-686/kernel/drivers/media/video/ov511.ko

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=history;f=drivers/media/video/ov511.c;h=9edaca4371d7cedb5903d324e531eb4f16469a38;hb=HEAD

Unless I'm missing something ov511 should be removed from Lenny
and the archive.

Cheers,
        Moritz

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.32-3+rm

The ov511 package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/496822 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues
http://Marco.Tondela.org


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to