Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2005 00:02:13 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#312963: fixed in netatalk 2.0.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jun 2005 03:55:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 10 20:55:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fed1rmmtao09.cox.net [68.230.241.30] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Dgx5j-0002QA-00; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:55:27 -0700
Received: from mailhost.moonkingdom.net ([70.179.43.17])
          by fed1rmmtao09.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP
          id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
          Fri, 10 Jun 2005 23:54:57 -0400
Received: from rei.moonkingdom.net (rei.moonkingdom.net [192.168.0.4])
        by mailhost.moonkingdom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F5904AD4D;
        Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:54:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rei.moonkingdom.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 10 Jun 2005 
20:54:56 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: netatalk 2.0.2-4 depends on non-existent packages
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:54:56 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: netatalk
Version: 2.0.2-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

As below:

rei $ sudo apt-get install netatalk
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  netatalk: Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.5-1) but 2.3.2.ds1-22 is to be installed
            Depends: libcupsys2 (>= 1.1.99.b1-1) but it is not going to be 
installed
E: Broken packages


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.8
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages netatalk depends on:
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcupsys2-gnutls10         1.1.23-10    Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - 
ii  libdb4.2                    4.2.52-18    Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [
ii  libgssapi1-heimdal          0.6.3-10     Libraries for Heimdal Kerberos
ii  libpam-modules              0.76-22      Pluggable Authentication Modules f
ii  libpam-runtime              0.76-22      Runtime support for the PAM librar
ii  libpam0g                    0.76-22      Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii  libslp1                     1.0.11a-2    OpenSLP libraries
ii  libwrap0                    7.6.dbs-8    Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra
ii  netbase                     4.21         Basic TCP/IP networking system
ii  perl                        5.8.4-8      Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 312963-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jun 2005 04:08:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 25 21:08:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DmOR7-00059n-00; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 21:08:01 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DmOLV-0004ye-00; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 00:02:13 -0400
From: Sebastian Rittau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#312963: fixed in netatalk 2.0.2-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 00:02:13 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: netatalk
Source-Version: 2.0.2-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
netatalk, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

netatalk_2.0.2-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/n/netatalk/netatalk_2.0.2-5.diff.gz
netatalk_2.0.2-5.dsc
  to pool/main/n/netatalk/netatalk_2.0.2-5.dsc
netatalk_2.0.2-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/netatalk/netatalk_2.0.2-5_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sebastian Rittau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated netatalk package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 05:53:52 +0200
Source: netatalk
Binary: netatalk
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.2-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sebastian Rittau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Sebastian Rittau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 netatalk   - AppleTalk user binaries
Closes: 312963
Changes: 
 netatalk (2.0.2-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Recompile against unstable libc6 and CUPS. (Closes: #312963)
   * Policy version 3.6.2. (No changes required.)
Files: 
 43d9e18880b5b0aaf3fc5de413aac9e7 789 net extra netatalk_2.0.2-5.dsc
 555ab3d009c8f93df26fb18578e8ed6e 19821 net extra netatalk_2.0.2-5.diff.gz
 3ecbdf3707dd3a457c475a9f49c263a1 765706 net extra netatalk_2.0.2-5_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCvinycU5mtElqGCcRAnQAAKDiJXMbPDe/wxKffHQ2W659CXR1gwCfUvgJ
p0dFLCb4NVbNseFKqNmGZGI=
=HRY7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to