Your message dated Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:54:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line mono architecture situation changed again
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Sep 2004 22:47:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 01 15:47:07 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 205-200-74-130.static.mts.net (Zimmer) [205.200.74.130]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C2dsh-00058h-00; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 15:47:07 -0700
Received: from ddaniels by Zimmer with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1C2dsg-0000EH-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 17:47:06 -0500
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 17:47:06 -0500
From: Drew Scott Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mono won't enter testing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: mono
Severity: serious
Justification: ftbfs on arm
---------------------
There's no request to remove mono-mint against ftp.debian.org.
The "mono (1.0-4) unstable;" changelog entry says:
* Eduard Bloch
+ disabled mono-mint build for i386 and powerpc, upstream wish
According to http://packages.debian.org/unstable/interpreters/mono-mint
there's still "1.0-3 [i386, powerpc]". Why did upstream only request
that a few arch's have mono-mint removed, and not the others (alpha,
arm, s390, sparc)?
--------------------
Also:
mono hasn't been tried on arm since 20040610-1450 (0.91-1).
http://buildd.debian.org/stats/arm-all.txt says:
interpreters/mono_1.0.1-1: Dep-Wait by buildd_arm-elara
[optional:out-of-date]
Dependencies: libicu28-dev
Previous state was Building until 2004 Jun 26 08:45:53
and:
devel/monodevelop_0.5-2: Dep-Wait by buildd_arm-europa
[optional:uncompiled]
Dependencies: gtk-sharp-gapi
Previous state was Building until 2004 Jun 09 18:23:07
[...]
web/mod-mono_1.0-1: Needs-Build [optional:uncompiled]
Previous state was Building until 2004 Aug 13 18:10:26
libicu28-dev doesn't exist on arm! Therefore there's a ftbfs on arm.
Perhaps there's another icu development package?
--------------------
Also:
mono-assemblies-arch (source mcs) is out of date on s390. mcs also
requires that s390 builds mono-jay.
--------------------
Also:
"easy mono mcs" from debian-release (Release Managers) is needed when
the packages are ready?
--------------------
Drew Daniels
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 283380-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jun 2005 12:54:41 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 25 05:54:41 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from booster.qnetp.net [213.239.220.50]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DmABE-0004hN-00; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 05:54:41 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by booster.qnetp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2722DBF19;
Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:54:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.0.2] (c214175.adsl.hansenet.de [213.39.214.175])
by booster.qnetp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846262DBD04;
Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:54:36 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: mono architecture situation changed again
From: Mirco Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-qI7pX1C+J/76CpgRE9D5"
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:54:35 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at qnetp.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
--=-qI7pX1C+J/76CpgRE9D5
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The situation with supported architectures in Mono changed again, the
removal requests are becoming very hard to track (they are open about a
year by now, and the requests changed at least 3 times during this
time).
I am closing all Mono related removal requests and I will open new
proper requests for them, I agreed this with Jeroen van Wolffelaar.
--=20
Regards,
Mirco 'meebey' Bauer
PGP-Key:
http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xEEF946C8
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GIT d s-:+ a-- C++ UL++++$ P L++$>+++$ E- W+++$ N o? K- w++>! O---- M-
V? PS
PE+ Y- PGP++ t 5+ X++ R tv+ b+ DI? D+ G>++ e h! r->++ y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
--=-qI7pX1C+J/76CpgRE9D5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUAQr1UC3En5avu+UbIAQKrAgf/a8KIikSln32AR4fVKG8nY5wm2lKQhyD5
++dWgOC+RxDtCsEGO2lNjSz88PxrUJxfVLFfjoufVWqNfjzZHCupOlukvZYVXioO
tUoPxphRnEE32xcrUpf4/7csmB0e0TiL/pVTSfebyOes7rmqHFb4X2UugJQtKv4E
Uga2q/o9JW7asD+hfTIlqt6bgDjXa3Wa5hObJIIIUuU0SmbPkafEUUS7/Sja7yaL
R36oBek+prCkPG8LHY8rV2g8Jwtvm3DxVroMzhDZk+536G+LKIJW42k71OMeDQ1o
GA85OrlwwxYdBv0iRCSDH5Oc93u8XVqyqBmQtOxW41CVf/LQJBNpvA==
=dBet
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-qI7pX1C+J/76CpgRE9D5--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
