block 495359 by 495703
thanks

On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 02:09:54PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:

> Hm, this doesn't seem too bad. The gs-common package is somewhat a special
> case because it has a prerm in Etch but not in Lenny. Most prerm scripts
> treat 'failed-upgrade' as a no-op so that installation continues normally.

I have now gone through all the packages in Etch depending on defoma.
The only one that fails upgrades is gs-common. I found 14 packages whose
'old-prerm upgrade' fails, but 'new-prerm failed-upgrade' succeeds.

So the critical severity seems to boil down to a bug in gs-common,
which I just filed as #495703, and the "debsums problem".

Henning, can you dig out more detail of the circumstances where
the debsums invocation fails? It sounds strange that apt would call
DPkg::Post-Invoke while packages are unpacked but not configured.
Is it possible that it only happens when the upgrade is interrupted
because of some other errors?

For the sake of completeness, the defoma packages surviving
'new-prerm failed-upgrade' are:

 fontconfig
 grace6
 gsfonts
 libpango1
 libwmf0
 psfontmgr
 ttf-kochi-gothic
 ttf-kochi-mincho
 ttf-sazanami-gothic
 ttf-sazanami-mincho
 ttf-vlgothic
 vflib3
 xdvik-ja
 x-ttcidfont-conf

-- 
Niko Tyni   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to