Le jeudi 14 août 2008 à 08:37 -0300, Christian Perrier a écrit :
> Quoting Sven Dowideit ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > I really dunno.
> > 
> > I recal having an explicit ack to the NMU's a few years ago, and being
> > told to remove it.
> > 
> > The longer I do this debian stuff, the more I wish lintian were more
> > helpful, and more retentive.
> > 
> > IF is it policy to ack MNU's in the next changelog, lintian should
> > probly complain bitterly :)
> 
> 
> It is not now. Since the BTS is using version control, NMU
> acknowledgment is useless and may even confuse version control
> (version control is what says "this bug is fixed in that version" on
> bugs.debian.org and builds these fancy diagrans in the top right
> corner of bugs pages.
> 
> In the past, NMU ACK was needed to really close bugs fixed in an NMU
> as NMUs were only tagging the bugs as "fixed", not really closing
> them.
> 
> Since version control was implemented, this is no longer needed.

OK, my fault.

Sorry about bothering.
-- 
Olivier BERGER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 1024D/6B829EEC
Ingénieur Recherche - Dept INF
Institut TELECOM, SudParis (http://www.it-sudparis.eu/), Evry (France)




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to