Your message dated Sat, 12 Jul 2008 20:46:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#490416: libdbd-sqlite3-perl: FTBFS: tests failed
has caused the Debian Bug report #490416,
regarding libdbd-sqlite3-perl: FTBFS: tests failed
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
490416: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=490416
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libdbd-sqlite3-perl
Version: 1.14-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080711 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.

Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory 
> `/build/user-libdbd-sqlite3-perl_1.14-2-amd64-PVysp5/libdbd-sqlite3-perl-1.14-2'
> PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" 
> "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
> t/00basic...............Name "DBD::SQLite::sqlite_version" used only once: 
> possible typo at /usr/lib/perl/5.10/DynaLoader.pm line 219.
> ok
> t/01logon...............ok
> t/02cr_table............ok
> t/03insert..............ok
> t/04select..............ok
> t/05tran................ok
> t/06error...............ok
> t/07busy................DBD::SQLite::db do failed: database is locked(5) at 
> dbdimp.c line 403 at t/07busy.t line 72, <READER> line 1.
> Issuing rollback() for database handle being DESTROY'd without explicit 
> disconnect() at t/07busy.t line 72, <READER> line 1.
> dubious
>       Test returned status 11 (wstat 2816, 0xb00)
> DIED. FAILED test 8
>       Failed 1/8 tests, 87.50% okay
> t/08create_function.....ok
> t/09create_aggregate....ok
> t/10dsnlist.............ok
> t/11unicode.............ok
> t/20createdrop..........ok
> t/30insertfetch.........ok
> t/40bindparam...........ok
> t/40blobs...............ok
> t/40blobtext............ok
> t/40listfields..........ok
> t/40nulls...............ok
> t/40numrows.............ok
> t/40prepcached..........ok
> t/50chopblanks..........ok
> t/50commit..............ok
> t/60metadata............ok
> t/70schemachange........ok
> t/90cppcomments.........ok
> t/99cleanup.............ok
> t/ak-dbd................ok
> t/dbdadmin..............ok
> Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail  List of Failed
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> t/07busy.t    11  2816     8    2  8
> Failed 1/29 test scripts. 1/463 subtests failed.
> Files=29, Tests=463, 44 wallclock secs ( 0.95 cusr +  0.19 csys =  1.14 CPU)
> Failed 1/29 test programs. 1/463 subtests failed.
> make[1]: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255

The full build log is available from:
   http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2008/07/11

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386
environment.  Internet was not accessible from the build systems.

-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 12/07/08 at 20:55 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> -=| gregor herrmann, Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 01:17:43PM +0200 |=-
> > On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 10:21:23 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > 
> > > > t/07busy................DBD::SQLite::db do failed: database is 
> > > > locked(5) at dbdimp.c line 403 at t/07busy.t line 72, <READER> line 1.
> > 
> > I cannot reproduce this in a sid cowbuilder chroot. I built the
> > package ~5 times, and the 07busy test always passes.
> > Might be some timeout issue in this test with the two processes and
> > the pipe.
> 
> I looped the test for several minutes and it passed every time. On a 
> 4-way amd64 system.
> 
> Lucas, is the failure reproducible for you?

Nope. I'll close it now, and reopen if I can reproduce it later.

Thanks for the investigation!
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to