Your message dated Tue, 8 Jul 2008 15:34:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#489883: Maintainer address is not deliverable.
has caused the Debian Bug report #489883,
regarding Maintainer address is not deliverable.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
489883: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=489883
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: tetex-ucs
Severity: serious
When I reassigned a bug report to tetex-ucs, I got the attached
bounce. The Maintainer address of a package ought to be deliverable
IMO, even if it only exists in stable.
Daniel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to en_US.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- Begin Message ---
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
host puccini.debian.org [87.106.4.56]: 550 5.1.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 71-217-92-155.tukw.qwest.net ([71.217.92.155]:62499
helo=[127.0.1.1])
by algebraicthunk.net with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
id 1KGDh9-0007WX-9q; Tue, 08 Jul 2008 06:57:27 -0700
From: Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: setting package to apt, reassign 489825 to tetex-ucs,
severity of 489825 is serious ...
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 06:57:10 -0700
X-BTS-Version: 2.10.33
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.33
package apt
reassign 489825 tetex-ucs
severity 489825 serious
retitle 489825 Removing tetex-ucs fails (mktexlsr: command not found), breaking
upgrades to texlive.
--- End Message ---
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 07:14:18AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Package: tetex-ucs
> Severity: serious
>
> When I reassigned a bug report to tetex-ucs, I got the attached
> bounce. The Maintainer address of a package ought to be deliverable
> IMO, even if it only exists in stable.
But it doesn't exist in stable, nor even oldstable. There's no record of
it in http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals-full.txt going back to 2001.
Reading the bug, it looks like you meant latex-ucs, not tetex-ucs.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- End Message ---
