On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 04:26:11PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 04:07:53PM +0200, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 09, 2008, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > - Compiles with xulrunner 1.9, but a lot of functionality is disabled due > > > to being no longer exposed by xulrunner (or not working) > > > - MyPortal > > > - User stylesheets > > > - Remembering passwords > > > - http authentication > > > > > > Note these four are bullshit, and galeon can be patched to have these > > > work. > > > > Right, I knew about these regressions; I didn't upload the new upstream > > nor didn't spend time moving to XUL 1.9 because I din't want to push > > these regressions to unstable, nor silently to testing. I'm not sure > > people want a Galeon which can't remember passwords or do http > > authentication, at least I don't. > > > > > Let's already get galeon built against xulrunner-1.9 first, and focus on > > > these regressions later. > > > > I don't think it's a good idea; I'd rather keep Galeon built against > > the older xulrunner. If the old xulrunner can't be kept in testing > > because we don't want to release with it, then galeon and xulrunner > > should be kicked from there until an usable galeon is available for > > xulrunner 1.9. > > It will be harder to get a useable galeon in shape if we can't have people > actually testing it for regressions, in case there are more. > xulrunner 1.8 *is* going to be kicked out and *not* released in Lenny.
Here is my offer: you get galeon 2.0.5 to build against xulrunner-dev in pkg-gnome svn, and I get at least http authentication to work, and we put that in unstable. What do you think ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
