Fabian Greffrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Reinhard Tartler schrieb: >> On the other hand, I'm not exactly sure why ffmpeg-config is in the >> libavutil-dev package at all. It could as well go directly to >> libavcodec-dev, so we wouldn't have to force libavutil-dev to depend on >> libavcodec-dev. Package would then need to depend on libavcodec-dev in >> order to use it, which might or might not be a good idea. > > If we move ffmpeg-config from libavutil-dev to libavcodec-dev (what we > should definitely do IMHO), then we need libavutil-dev to depend on > libavcodec-dev anyway to satisfy packages that expect ffmpeg-config in > libavutil-dev.
Okay, then let's do that. Can you prepare that in svn please, then? >> In any case, I think ffmpeg-config should go away. Upstream is providing >> pkg-config as mechanism for that. I know that obviously quite some >> packages in debian use ffmpeg-config for that, but we should fix that >> IMO. > > Definitely, since ffmpeg-config is an unnecessary diversion from > upstream. Should we keep it until Lenny, though? I'm not sure. I think we should determine the list of packages using ffmpeg-config and file wishlist bugs against them right now, preferably with patches. If we manage to get these patches in before lenny, we can drop it before release! -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
