Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2005 15:52:51 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311966: fixed in proguard 3.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jun 2005 14:05:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 04 07:05:13 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailout.stusta.mhn.de) [141.84.69.5] 
        by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DeZGy-0003Vh-00; Sat, 04 Jun 2005 07:05:12 -0700
Received: (qmail 21585 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2005 14:04:40 -0000
Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144)
  by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 4 Jun 2005 14:04:40 -0000
Received: by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id EA8F0BB53A; Sat,  4 Jun 2005 16:04:38 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: proguard doesn't work although the dependencies are fulfilled
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 16:04:38 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: 2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: proguard
Version: 3.2-1
Severity: grave

$ proguardgui 
/usr/bin/proguardgui: line 3: exec: kaffe: not found
$ proguard    
/usr/bin/proguard: line 3: exec: gij: not found
$ 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-rc4-mm2
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages proguard depends on:
ii  j2sdk [java-virtual-machine]  2:1.4.2-1  Java(TM) 2 Software Development Ki

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 311966-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jun 2005 19:56:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 05 12:56:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Df1EK-0002Hh-00; Sun, 05 Jun 2005 12:56:20 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Df1Ax-0007NA-00; Sun, 05 Jun 2005 15:52:51 -0400
From: Sam Clegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#311966: fixed in proguard 3.2-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 15:52:51 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: proguard
Source-Version: 3.2-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
proguard, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

proguard_3.2-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/proguard/proguard_3.2-2.diff.gz
proguard_3.2-2.dsc
  to pool/main/p/proguard/proguard_3.2-2.dsc
proguard_3.2-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/proguard/proguard_3.2-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sam Clegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated proguard package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  4 Jun 2005 21:17:01 +0100
Source: proguard
Binary: proguard
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sam Clegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Sam Clegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 proguard   - java class file shrinker, optimizer, and obfuscator
Closes: 311966
Changes: 
 proguard (3.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * fix java executable name in proguard and proguardgui shell
     scripts (Closes: #311966)
Files: 
 f92c50efcef8a8cf70bc308352960ac6 592 devel optional proguard_3.2-2.dsc
 713d8972770e6af7ad3814575bcd1603 1783 devel optional proguard_3.2-2.diff.gz
 615b485f5e0d1cae0e61c11fd6bc5bab 810432 devel optional proguard_3.2-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCogzULOvxONke42kRAn+6AKC8CghV2+c/hYnR/pbY4uH4KtfewwCglyvx
V69lfd9ytRBAgkvdxix60kI=
=j9ew
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to