Your message dated Fri, 03 Jun 2005 11:32:11 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300574: fixed in ldapdns 2.06-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Mar 2005 14:29:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 20 06:29:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ns1.tschaeche.com (smtp.tschaeche.com) [213.133.112.43]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DD1Qb-0007ma-00; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 06:29:17 -0800
Received: from localhost (ns1.tschaeche.com [213.133.112.43])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.tschaeche.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F9466143;
Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:29:11 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:29:10 +0100
From: Oliver Tschaeche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ldapdns misses requirements of RFC2308
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: ldapdns
Severity: important
I reported that problem already to Mrs.Brisby.
Since Christmas there is a new version 2.06
which has fixed that problem. Thus, updating
to the new version fixes this problem.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 300574-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jun 2005 15:42:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 03 08:42:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DeEJ8-0003M7-00; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 08:42:02 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DeE9b-0002Ya-00; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 11:32:11 -0400
From: Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#300574: fixed in ldapdns 2.06-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 11:32:11 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: ldapdns
Source-Version: 2.06-3
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ldapdns, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
ldapdns_2.06-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/ldapdns/ldapdns_2.06-3.diff.gz
ldapdns_2.06-3.dsc
to pool/main/l/ldapdns/ldapdns_2.06-3.dsc
ldapdns_2.06-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/ldapdns/ldapdns_2.06-3_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated ldapdns package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:48:59 +0200
Source: ldapdns
Binary: ldapdns
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.06-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
ldapdns - DNS server that pulls data from an LDAP directory
Closes: 300574
Changes:
ldapdns (2.06-3) unstable; urgency=high
.
* The upstream didn't fixed Bug#300574, so I've included the patch.
The fix is important because for some caching nameservers the ldapdns's
domains are non-existent if there is no MX record, and then they don't ask
about A record. Finally, you get no mail for these domains.
Closes: #300574.
Files:
80eab97f1b542f7a5f6438dded032fab 569 net optional ldapdns_2.06-3.dsc
a28eecdf7b435776552f1819c1be6bce 7874 net optional ldapdns_2.06-3.diff.gz
089f70f232dffd756be7c4ffa4ab1e57 114026 net optional ldapdns_2.06-3_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCoHRphMHHe8CxClsRAr7gAKDLl3PQU9Lws7whQDQ2HB/wC9JgqACgo2vF
QwRy58b/iBgafv6fDCux+Kc=
=yKrn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
