Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 11:13:23AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Yes, it needs to use ucf. Tested patches would be very welcome; I'm >> not sure when I'm going to get a chance to understand ucf well enough >> to know what needs to be done -- possibly not until June. :/ (I only >> was educated about what it was supposed to be doing and why a few >> months ago; I had mistakenly thought that what it's doing currently was >> okay.) > No, ucf is not the answer. The answer is to parse the file (it is a > shell snippet so the shell already supports this) and set the debconf > values depending on that. ...okay, I feel really stupid now. I have no idea why I didn't think of that. Thank you! New packages will be coming very shortly. I'll take a look at how hard it will be to shuffle the LDAP library into a subdirectory while I'm at it. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
