Your message dated Thu, 02 Jun 2005 02:32:20 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311575: fixed in rt2500 1.1.0+cvs20050530-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jun 2005 00:03:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 01 17:03:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DddAx-0002BS-00; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 17:03:07 -0700
Received: from renig.nat.blars.org (plergb.nat.blars.org [172.16.1.1])
        by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id 
j52035it032010
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
        Wed, 1 Jun 2005 17:03:06 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) id j52035sl032008;
        Wed, 1 Jun 2005 17:03:05 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: rt2500: ftbfs [sparc] dh_testdir: Command not found
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 17:03:05 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: rt2500
Version: 1.1.0+cvs20050530-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source

rt2500 fails to build from source on sparc and all other buildds, duplicated
on sparc pbuilder.

dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is sparc
 /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
dh_testdir
make: dh_testdir: Command not found
make: *** [clean] Error 127


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 311575-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jun 2005 06:49:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 01 23:49:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DdjWB-0004Og-00; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 23:49:27 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DdjFc-0005hX-00; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 02:32:20 -0400
From: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#311575: fixed in rt2500 1.1.0+cvs20050530-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 02:32:20 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
        HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: rt2500
Source-Version: 1.1.0+cvs20050530-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rt2500, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

rt2500-base_1.1.0+cvs20050530-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/r/rt2500/rt2500-base_1.1.0+cvs20050530-2_all.deb
rt2500-source_1.1.0+cvs20050530-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/r/rt2500/rt2500-source_1.1.0+cvs20050530-2_all.deb
rt2500_1.1.0+cvs20050530-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/rt2500/rt2500_1.1.0+cvs20050530-2.diff.gz
rt2500_1.1.0+cvs20050530-2.dsc
  to pool/main/r/rt2500/rt2500_1.1.0+cvs20050530-2.dsc
rt2500_1.1.0+cvs20050530-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rt2500/rt2500_1.1.0+cvs20050530-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated rt2500 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu,  2 Jun 2005 08:22:33 +0200
Source: rt2500
Binary: rt2500 rt2500-source rt2500-base
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1.1.0+cvs20050530-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 rt2500     - configuration tool for wireless RT2500 network cards
 rt2500-base - configuration files for wireless RT2500 network cards
 rt2500-source - RT2500 wireless network drivers source
Closes: 311575
Changes: 
 rt2500 (1.1.0+cvs20050530-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Build-Depends on debhelper (closes: bug#311575).
Files: 
 0dd78c27da11f03a320d3bb686d85f61 676 net extra rt2500_1.1.0+cvs20050530-2.dsc
 3e4b61620ac93bb81df95726a928ec98 5102 net extra 
rt2500_1.1.0+cvs20050530-2.diff.gz
 7dd8b10d36cc54b3b7ea39ba85ade8fc 239888 net extra 
rt2500-source_1.1.0+cvs20050530-2_all.deb
 e29c8df8e11df95b12dd14b1aab59f3a 4678 net extra 
rt2500-base_1.1.0+cvs20050530-2_all.deb
 9a24b257da868853b440bce75f85c8be 103344 net extra 
rt2500_1.1.0+cvs20050530-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCnqZ1w3ao2vG823MRAi5AAJ4uEMmqyXxvL/szrkTSMc+WgEGXDwCcDVy2
XpvhU6NKO8G597tYeuJN2fk=
=ZKT5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to