Hi Stephen,
* Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-18 18:00]:
> This one time, at band camp, Nico Golde said:
> > * Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-18 16:09]:
> > > 
> > > Already fixed in etch and unstable (it's the issue referenced as not
> > > yet having a CVE ID in the DSA).
> > 
> > Are you sure? Looking at the source code from the unstable 
> > version I still see the affected lines of code:
[...] 
> > How was this fixed?
> 
> Arg - you may be right - I see the upack vulnerability fixed in
> unstable, but it looks like I may not have gotten the wwpack
> vulnerability in the patch.

Ok fine. Usually I ask for verification if I don't already 
know if this is fixed or not if I file a bug, I can be wrong thought ;-P

> Sorry - this week has been really bad for
> me (I have guests staying and I'm really busy at work, so my
> concentration is a bit shot).  It looks like I may also have missed it
> for volatile.  Damn.

Happens, stable should be unfixed as well cause I used the 
stable diff to check for changes.

> This appears to be the patch in question:
> http://git.debian.org/?p=users/sgran/clamav-devel.git;a=commitdiff;h=65f47ca3711e1bc99970c5eabc0a0598dcd46f26#patch43
> 
> I'll apply the patch here, but I'm unlikely to be able to upload to
> unstable before Monday night - I'm off for a disconnected weekend in 2
> hours, and I'm still at work.  Feel free to NMU, if you like.

Ok, will do that tomorrow.
Kind regards
Nico
-- 
Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.

Attachment: pgpTTg81xq5np.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to