Your message dated Tue, 31 May 2005 05:32:07 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310662: fixed in star 1.5a60-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2005 03:53:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 20:53:32 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail04.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.185] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DamxY-0000BP-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 20:53:32 -0700
Received: from espresso.caffeine (c211-30-49-101.mirnd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au 
[211.30.49.101])
        by mail04.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id 
j4P3rRJE021540
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 25 May 2005 13:53:28 +1000
Received: from netsnipe by espresso.caffeine with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1DamxT-00033x-7L
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 25 May 2005 13:53:27 +1000
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 13:53:27 +1000
From: Andrew Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: star: missing most of bin/*
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.12
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x2E8B68BD
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 0B77 73D0 4F3B F286 63F1 9F4A 9B24 C07D 2E8B 68BD
X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.dtype.org:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2E8B68BD
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: star
Version: 1.5a60-1
Severity: grave

Hi Pawel,

It seems like half the binaries in the star package have disappeared.

% dpkg --contents star_1.5a60-1_i386.deb | grep /bin
drwxr-xr-x root/root         0 2005-05-23 17:41:03 ./
drwxr-xr-x root/root         0 2005-05-23 17:41:02 ./bin/
-rwxr-xr-x root/root     31244 2005-05-23 17:41:02 ./bin/mt-star
-rwxr-xr-x root/root     39404 2005-05-23 17:41:02 ./bin/star_sym
-rwxr-xr-x root/root     24300 2005-05-23 17:41:02 ./bin/tartest

Star in testing:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents.pl?searchmode=3Dfilelist=
&word=3Dstar&version=3Dtesting&arch=3Di386

bin/gnutar                                                  utils/star
bin/mt-star                                                 utils/star
bin/scpio                                                   utils/star
bin/spax                                                    utils/star
bin/star                                                    utils/star
bin/star_sym                                                utils/star
bin/suntar                                                  utils/star
bin/tartest                                                 utils/star
sbin/rmt-star                                               utils/star

Cheers,
Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-k7
Locale: LANG=3Den_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8)

Versions of packages star depends on:
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared librarie=
s an

-- no debconf information

--=20
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau      <http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~alau/>
         Debian GNU/Linux Maintainer & Computer Science, UNSW
                                     -
                  "Nobody expects the Debian Inquisition!
     Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency!"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

--HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCk/a3myTAfS6LaL0RApuZAJ9OEf+tBYkW8/JvlUJ0QJszEWUN8gCfazrS
k1oBAJEN7qMCI6cBdQ/wtf0=
=iwU2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 310662-close) by bugs.debian.org; 31 May 2005 09:38:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 31 02:38:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Dd3CG-0001Q4-00; Tue, 31 May 2005 02:38:04 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Dd36V-000162-00; Tue, 31 May 2005 05:32:07 -0400
From: Pawel Wiecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#310662: fixed in star 1.5a60-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 05:32:07 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: star
Source-Version: 1.5a60-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
star, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

star_1.5a60-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/star/star_1.5a60-2.diff.gz
star_1.5a60-2.dsc
  to pool/main/s/star/star_1.5a60-2.dsc
star_1.5a60-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/star/star_1.5a60-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Pawel Wiecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated star package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 10:42:10 +0200
Source: star
Binary: star
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.5a60-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pawel Wiecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Pawel Wiecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 star       - A fast POSIX-compliant tape archiver
Closes: 310662
Changes: 
 star (1.5a60-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Fixed a horrible mess upstream made in star_fat.c (with great thanks to
     smake's "feature" of not stopping build process on compilation errors)
     (closes: #310662)
Files: 
 1b8893f5ab6627e8d15a6205f1cdb21e 642 utils optional star_1.5a60-2.dsc
 9aa225b9f2cb7190091cb909f9adbc28 10430 utils optional star_1.5a60-2.diff.gz
 d9066e0a930b93b8b7fbc8834eadd99b 281902 utils optional star_1.5a60-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCnCyvBOdjEO/Bh3ARAvdXAJ9WYv8byhpME+5WZbs2XUkGsWfPjACeITc1
+gDtvJX76wbvLWlCnCCyduo=
=oKwh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to