On 30 May 2005 at 14:20, Steve Langasek wrote:
| > Don't think so. Mawk is priority required. It can be assumed to be present. 
| 
| No, it cannot.  You are only ever allowed to assume that packages that are
| Essential: yes (or in the case of build-dependencies, part of
| build-essential) are present.

Ok, point taken.

| It would probably be better if r-base-dev simply specified "awk", which IIRC
| is "virtually-essential" by virtue of being a dependency of an essential
| package.

I like that much better. So now the changelog stands at

  * debian/rules: configure call with AWK="/usr/bin/awk"
  * debian/control: Build-Depends on mawk | gawk | awk
  * debian/control: Depends for r-base-core on 'mawk | gawk | awk'

This is subtler than Chris' patch imposing mawk which is dislike: given that
we have the choice, we should honour it.

| In any case, I've tagged this sarge-ignore because being
| virtually-essential, mawk is available on all Debian buildds -- accounting
| for the lack of *actual* build failures on archs other than amd64.

Thanks, this sounds good to me.

Dirk

-- 
Statistics: The (futile) attempt to offer certainty about uncertainty.
         -- Roger Koenker, 'Dictionary of Received Ideas of Statistics'


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to