On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 09:55 +0000, Moritz Naumann wrote: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Received: from janus.zertificon.com [213.23.92.1] with HTTP/1.1 (POST); Fri, > 11 > Apr 2008 09:55:58 +0000 > User-Agent: freeIT.org Webmail > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > > > Thanks for providing the updated MD5! > > > > Unfortunately, this does not seem to fix this version of the package: > > > > If a user already has version 1.4~bpo40+1 (or the 1.4 version as available > > in sid for this matter) of the package installed, she will not retrieve the > > update when doing aptitude dist-upgrade. >
Does this work ? man update-flashplugin-nonfree update-flashplugin-nonfree --install > > > If a user did not have flashplugin-nonfree installed (from sid or > > etch-backports) and installs it now, she will end up with an unhelpful > > error message saying: > > > MD5 checkum mismatch > > > failed: --install > Are you sure about that ? > > > And while the package has been successfully installed by means of the > > package manager, its functionality is not provided, which, in my point of > > view, should make us consider it broken. > Installing update-flashplugin-nonfree is successful. Running update-flashplugin-nonfree is successful depending on multiple conditions, including networking. > > > And for those who already have version 1.4~bpo40+1 (etch-backports) or > > version 1.4 (sid) installed, the security impact remains, and with this bug > > being closed, they have no debian way (such as through apt-listbugs) to > > find out. > The user of flashplugin-nonfree is expected to use update-flashplugin-nonfree to keep the plugin up-to-date. Regards, Bart Martens
