also sprach Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.03.17.1748 +0100]: > Since logcheck ships lots and lots of files, it may be best for lpr to > either rename the file to something like, like lpr.package, or just drop > the file altogether. I'll take a look at the rules today and get this done..
The rules should just be merged into one file and distributed as part of the lpr package. > Ideally, logcheck shipping its files named <package>.logcheck or > <package>.lc or similar would have been more compatible with > packages providing their own rules. But I guess that can't really > be done now.. logcheck-database exists as a bag for rules that are not in the packages. If a package provides its own rule files, the logcheck-database must not. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems "man soll nicht in kirchen gehn, wenn man reine luft atmen will." - friedrich nietzsche
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
