Hi, On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 11:23:38 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > reopen 370349 > unblock 311188 by 370349 > thanks
(This has been merged with 462739 which was grave, although I'm not really sure the severity is appropriate). > On Monday 28 January 2008 04:55, Guillem wrote: > > Who is we? :) > > "We" is Debian Edu here :) Ok. :) > > And why would the fact that that "we" is not using it > > anymore make this bug invalid? > > Right. As nobody has replied to this bug before, I was under the impression > that nobody besides Debian Edu wanted this feature. But if you want to keep > this open, have it ;-) I cooked two patches implementing the /etc/syslog.d/ parsing. I might run them through upstream first, otherwise I'll test them and just deploy in Debian. > > > Holger (who thinks that this bug might actually have been a bogus > > > duplicate of #370399...) > > I don't see why, could you explain? > > I guess it was also just late and I was a bit confused by the amount of > syslogs available :-) No problem! regards, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
