On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 18:36:07 +0100, Sebastian Harl wrote: > Sorry, this patch does not change anything. "a && b" is basically the > same as "if a; then b; fi" which is what you're doing here. This issue > has already been addressed in the fix for #447961. > Well no. "a && b" is only successful if both "a" and "b" exit successfully. If you don't want to fail when udev is not running, that patch is correct.
Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
