* Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080304 15:07]:
> Did you also test other terminal emulators?
No, I just stumbled over rxvt poping up on an unexpected place.
* Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080305 12:54]:
> I don't think its a user mistake if rxvt does not return a
> message that DISPLAY is not set and uses a "random" one
> instead.
I think a random one would be more harmless. This way it is a
predictable, so any user (even daemon or nobody) can just open :0
and wait for connections as long as no :0 is already running.
Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
P.S: you only wrote your mail to the bug, not to the submitter, so
I only accidentially saw it. (Now I subscribed, so I will get them).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
