Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: >> Thanks for the suggestion. It looks like a good one. > > The suggestion also applies to the 'md5' module, after which the 'sha1' module > is modeled.
Yep. md2 and md4 too. For now, I've pushed the sha1 changes. > But if you apply the suggestion to both the sha1 and md5 modules, we get > an additional difference to glibc code. That's unfortunate, but I agree it's not a big problem. If upstream glibc is no longer able to evolve, I don't want to let that impede progress here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
