Your message dated Sun, 6 Jan 2008 11:14:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#408701: [ISC-Bugs #16647] PPC atomic ops
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: bind9
Version: 9.4.0~rc2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
include -I./include -D_REENTRANT -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wformat -Wpointer-arith -fno-strict-aliasing -c
hash.c
gcc "-I/source/bind9/bind9-9.4.0~rc2" -I./unix/include -I./pthreads/include
-I./powerpc/include -I./include -I./include -D_REENTRANT -g -O2 -W -Wall
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wformat -Wpointer-arith
-fno-strict-aliasing -c hash.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/hash.o
./powerpc/include/isc/atomic.h:91: warning: 'isc_atomic_store' defined but not
used
./powerpc/include/isc/atomic.h:105: warning: 'isc_atomic_cmpxchg' defined but
not used
/tmp/ccmVa2Gc.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccmVa2Gc.s:25: Error: unsupported relocation against r6
/tmp/ccmVa2Gc.s:26: Error: unsupported relocation against r6
/tmp/ccmVa2Gc.s:27: Error: unsupported relocation against r6
/tmp/ccmVa2Gc.s:27: Error: unsupported relocation against r6
/tmp/ccmVa2Gc.s:28: Error: unsupported relocation against r6
make[3]: *** [hash.lo] Error 1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.20-rc6-aragorn
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
--
Experience is something you don't get until
just after you need it!
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:9.4.1-1
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 11:18:49PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Feb 08, Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Built without errors and warnings ;) But I can't test the IBM's RISC
> > ones, as I have none handy :(
> I do, and 9.4.1-1 works fine. I think this bug should be closed.
Thanks,
lamont
--- End Message ---
