> Why do you have -0 twice?
> What do you want this command-line option to do?

I think he's just reusing the command in the history of his shell
(like sometimes I do too: create a
patch+build+check+little-fix-on-the-patch looping)


>
> I would expect
>
>         dpatch-edit-patch -a -0 01_foo
>
> and yes, you don't need to specify -a or -0 the second time.
>
>         dpatch-edit-patch 01_foo
>
> would do the correct thing.

I think here we have to ignore the "-a" option for an existing patch,
and simply simulate the behaviour of "dpatch-edit-patch 01_foo"
(applying until previous patch than 01_foo and merging 01_foo for
changes). Junichi/Daniel, would you think this could be the way to go?
If so, I'll provide a patch to fix the problem.

Thanks,
Sandro

-- 
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to