Hi Sebastian, Any ideas on what we can do about this?
Thanks. On May 30, 2007 9:44 PM, Anuradha Weeraman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > > Ok, now that etch is release what shall we do about this bug, Anuradha? > > Does your upstream consider to change the name of the binary? > > Sorry for the late response, but I've been a bit busy lately and I've > not had much time for anything else. But things should change soon, > hopefully. > > The last time I spoke to Stelios, he was not completely for changing > the ncc binary name. According to his view, which I tend to agree > with, he believes nemerle should rename it's ncc binary to something > that's more appropriate for a dot-net application, such as with an > .exe suffix. > > But according to the CLI Policy [1] > > "Never ever install application files (.exe) directly into /usr/bin. > Instead create a wrapper script into /usr/bin to allow them to be run > without the .exe suffix." > > So I'm guessing that would not work? Forgive my ignorance on the CLI > policy, but do you know if it is an approved policy document? > > I realize this can be a stale mate situation, and I'm not clear what > nemerle's stance on this issue is and whether they would consent to a > name change. > > Any suggestions? > > [1] - http://pkg-mono.alioth.debian.org/cli-policy/ch-packaging.html > > -- > Anuradha Weeraman > http://www.linux.lk/~anu/ > http://anuradha.wordpress.com > -- Anuradha Weeraman http://www.linux.lk/~anu/ http://anuradha.wordpress.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
