Your message dated Sat, 1 Dec 2007 10:14:51 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#453787: hplip: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: couldn't
find library libhpip.so.0 needed by debian/hpijs/usr/bin/hpijs (its RPATH is
'').
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: hplip
version: 2.7.10-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071130 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning:
> debian/hplip/usr/lib/python-support/hplip/python2.4/scanext.so shouldn't be
> linked with libcups.so.2 (it uses none of its symbols).
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning:
> debian/hplip/usr/lib/python-support/hplip/python2.4/scanext.so shouldn't be
> linked with libnetsnmp.so.15 (it uses none of its symbols).
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning:
> debian/hplip/usr/lib/python-support/hplip/python2.4/scanext.so shouldn't be
> linked with libcrypto.so.0.9.8 (it uses none of its symbols).
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning:
> debian/hplip/usr/lib/python-support/hplip/python2.4/scanext.so shouldn't be
> linked with libdl.so.2 (it uses none of its symbols).
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning:
> debian/hplip/usr/lib/python-support/hplip/python2.4/scanext.so shouldn't be
> linked with libjpeg.so.62 (it uses none of its symbols).
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning:
> debian/hplip/usr/lib/python-support/hplip/python2.4/scanext.so shouldn't be
> linked with libm.so.6 (it uses none of its symbols).
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning:
> debian/hplip/usr/lib/python-support/hplip/python2.4/scanext.so shouldn't be
> linked with libpthread.so.0 (it uses none of its symbols).
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: debian/hplip/usr/lib/sane/libsane-hpaio.so.1.0.0
> shouldn't be linked with libsane.so.1 (it uses none of its symbols).
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: debian/hplip/usr/lib/sane/libsane-hpaio.so.1.0.0
> shouldn't be linked with libusb-0.1.so.4 (it uses none of its symbols).
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: debian/hplip/usr/lib/sane/libsane-hpaio.so.1.0.0
> shouldn't be linked with libnetsnmp.so.15 (it uses none of its symbols).
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: debian/hplip/usr/lib/sane/libsane-hpaio.so.1.0.0
> shouldn't be linked with libcrypto.so.0.9.8 (it uses none of its symbols).
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: debian/hplip/usr/lib/sane/libsane-hpaio.so.1.0.0
> shouldn't be linked with libdl.so.2 (it uses none of its symbols).
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: debian/hplip/usr/lib/sane/libsane-hpaio.so.1.0.0
> shouldn't be linked with libjpeg.so.62 (it uses none of its symbols).
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: debian/hplip/usr/lib/sane/libsane-hpaio.so.1.0.0
> shouldn't be linked with libm.so.6 (it uses none of its symbols).
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: debian/hplip/usr/lib/sane/libsane-hpaio.so.1.0.0
> shouldn't be linked with libpthread.so.0 (it uses none of its symbols).
> dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: couldn't find library libhpip.so.0 needed by
> debian/hpijs/usr/bin/hpijs (its RPATH is '').
> Note: libraries are not searched in other binary packages that do not have
> any shlibs file.
> To help dpkg-shlibdeps find private libraries, you might need to set
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
> dh_shlibdeps: command returned error code 512
> make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1
> dpkg-buildpackage: failure: /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error
> exit status 2
The full build log is available from:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/11/30
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386
environment. Internet was not accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.7.10-4
Lucas,
Thanks, but your report is a dup of #453361 and #453692 that was fixed last
night with the upload of 2.7.10-4 and was caused by a change in behaviour of
dpkg-shlibs.
Mark
On Saturday 01 December 2007, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> i386.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
