On Florent's request, I'm currently building a fixed tetex-base package with this fix in it. So that these sorts of things can be fixed for release, please can we avoid tampering with the main branches of the tetex-* CVS repositories; it seems silly to have a separate branch just for this release when 3.0 is waiting in the wings for post-sarge.
Thanks, Julian On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 12:19:26PM +0200, Florent Rougon wrote: > Hi, > > Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > tetex-base contains /usr/share/doc/texmf/doc as a symlink. > > I suppose you mean /usr/share/texmf/doc. > > > In woody the package ivritex contained this as a directory. > > This is a bug that was partially fixed in ivritex 1.0-3 and finally > fixed in version 1.1.1-3, according to its changelog (unfortunately, it > seems the proper place to put TeX documentation in wasn't well > documented in woody's tetex packages). > > > This can cause problems on woody->sarge upgrades. > > Noted. I think adding a Conflicts: ivritex (<< 1.1.1-3) would solve the > problem. Since users are supposed to dist-upgrade between major > releases, it shouldn't cause any problem. What do you think? > > Thank you for your report. > > -- > Florent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
