I've been talking to upstream about adopting this package, their thoughts on this RC bug:
-------- Forwarded Message -------- > From: Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Helge Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Frank Reppin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I would guess the shown bug is a gnustep-make packaging issue and > > needs to be fixed. Apparently gnustep-make is not properly versioned, > > you are trying to build libFoundation with gnustep-make 2.0 which is > > API incompatible with 1.1x. > > [Summary: gnustep-make2 should live in a gnustep-make2 package, not > > in gnustep-make1, this has potential to break a lot more software] > > Correct, we have gnustep-make 2.0.1 in Debian sid/unstable. There don't > seem to have been any bugs filed about this change, I guess not many > GNUStep folks/developers use Debian sid. Can libfoundation1.1 work with > gnustep-make2? If so, perhaps it would be good to remove 1.0 and have > 1.1 uploaded instead, if any packages that use it are compatible with > version 1.1, I don't see any packages in Debian that use it. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
