Your message dated Sat, 14 May 2005 17:26:17 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 1.9.3-1 debian/experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Apr 2005 11:31:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 13 04:31:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cicero2.cybercity.dk [212.242.40.53]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DLg5U-0000MB-00; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 04:31:16 -0700
Received: from user4.cybercity.dk (user4.cybercity.dk [212.242.41.50])
by cicero2.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67CDF18FB4C
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:31:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (port986.ds1-od.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.241.207])
by user4.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 408EC5012F
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:31:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [130.226.91.97] (helo=[127.0.0.1])
by localhost with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1DLf9Z-0005XY-00; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:31:26 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Morten Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libgnome2.0-cil: dependency problem with libgda2-1 and libgnomedb2-3
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:30:35 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libgnome2.0-cil
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental
Justification: renders package unusable
When installing libgnome2.0-cil with apt-get after a dist-upgrade to
unstable, it fails to install.
# apt-get install libgnome2.0-cil libgtksourceview2.0-cil
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libgnome2.0-cil: Depends: libgda2-1 (>= 1.0.4) but it is not going to
be installed
Depends: libgnomedb2-3 (>= 1.0.4) but it is not
going to be installed
E: Broken packages
In unstable libgda2-1 is replaced by libgda2-3.
I found the bug, when trying to in stal monodevelop from www.meebey.com
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: LANG=da_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=da_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 304467-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 May 2005 15:26:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 14 08:26:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from booster.qnetp.net [213.239.220.50]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DWyXW-0002C4-00; Sat, 14 May 2005 08:26:55 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by booster.qnetp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4671A2DA1F3
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 14 May 2005 17:26:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.0.2] (c196089.adsl.hansenet.de [213.39.196.89])
by booster.qnetp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DAF92DA1F2
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 14 May 2005 17:26:18 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: fixed in 1.9.3-1 debian/experimental
From: Mirco Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-qnDnkXWy2Rpqr/EmdHFl"
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 17:26:17 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at qnetp.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DSBL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--=-qnDnkXWy2Rpqr/EmdHFl
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
this bug was fixed with the upload of 1.9.3-1 which is compiled against
libgda2-3
--=20
Regards,
Mirco 'meebey' Bauer
PGP-Key:
http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xEEF946C8
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GIT d s-:+ a-- C++ UL++++$ P L++$>+++$ E- W+++$ N o? K- w++>! O---- M-
V? PS
PE+ Y- PGP++ t 5+ X++ R tv+ b+ DI? D+ G>++ e h! r->++ y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
--=-qnDnkXWy2Rpqr/EmdHFl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUAQoYYmXEn5avu+UbIAQJ10AgAnw51BYLxff2KKzzkWkliBEpsdPK1IYtp
yWvFObzpX98Ir1+lIpuFYaynpNZVnPcYCZT7Xcsbzu6n3q0YRkaMf4tkohXIllD/
J0/KaQ6a1gePN8bPhvTGOct4aXR9eDHnfZgzV1cRP/cRDJP2nTCXIoslztqI6bSv
RBO53aMT1y+csprQgbva0L5lvs6iZKDbNv1q2U/j928K+sEL2E3fYFvUqjWVah2F
A4bV+8myBjmYAThRj6/2DKljo48PJZzAp8qAyIE8EaXtIbJjfCJQ9LfmDj1er3p0
2jb/E2nrRFkxNhWogJS/HDowaFzGnjjk+zdDoe5IseLjmMeThHU0yQ==
=Iu/l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-qnDnkXWy2Rpqr/EmdHFl--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
