--On Friday, May 13, 2005 5:06 PM -0700 Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Quanah,
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 04:51:14PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:To answer your first question, the 64 bit patch was in response to:
<http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Build?id=3691>
I'm curious what you think is incorrect about that particular patch.
I simply don't know that it's necessary once the root cause of Debian bug # 304549 is addressed. Doubling the stack size for 64-bit archs is fine, # but at least in my 64-bit tests, slapd works fine once the library linkage is fixed so that slapd threads actually *get* the requested 4MB stack instead of a default 2MB one.
If this patch is known to fix a real problem, and not merely supposed to fix one, then by all means it should be added.
Ah. Yes, it is known to fix a real problem. ;)
As for the serious issue in 2.2.23, it is not addressed by any of my posted patches, they address other issues.
It was pulled in 2.2.25:
OpenLDAP 2.2.25 Release Removed broken libldap fast synchronous search result processing (ITS#3612)
The bug log suggests that this problem is specific to 2.2.24, which we're not shipping. (We're shipping 2.2.23.)
Hm, yeah, you're right. I got the backing down to 2.2.23 from 2.2.24 as a solution mixed up.
However, I would note the large number of bugs fixed between 2.2.23 & 2.2.26, including several crash fixes.
--Quanah
-- Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Developer ITSS/Shared Services Stanford University GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html
"These censorship operations against schools and libraries are stronger than ever in the present religio-political climate. They often focus on fantasy and sf books, which foster that deadly enemy to bigotry and blind faith, the imagination." -- Ursula K. Le Guin
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
