[d-release CC-ed for oppinion] [please CC at least debian-perl] -=| Christian Hammers, Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 08:24:50PM +0200 |=- > > > On 2007-06-23 Matthias Klose wrote: > > > > Package: libdbi-perl > > > ... > > > > This package has been indentified as one with header files in > > > > /usr/include matching 'long *double'. Please close this bug report > > > > if it is a false positive, or rename the package accordingly. > > > > > > The libdbi-perl package has no files in /usr/include. The long double > > > is only in a header file that is hidden deep in /usr/lib/perl5. > > > > > > Does it make sense to link against /usr/lib/perl5/auto/DBI/DBI.so? > > > > > > Do I really have to rename the pacakge? And if so to libdbi-perl-ldbl or > > > to libdbi-perlldbl? > > What do you think?
I think that /usr/lib/perl5/auto/DBI/DBI.so is used only by perl's Autoloader. This means we only have to depend on a perl that is compiled with the new glibc/gcc (and not rename the package). I guess we can use 5.8.8.11-1 as the one in testing (5.8.8-7) is the same as in stable anyway (and thus uses 64-bit long doubles)? -- dam JabberID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
