Your message dated Fri, 13 May 2005 16:00:37 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308792: After the last update Via C3 systems give
assertion failed in ld.so at boot
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 May 2005 11:35:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 12 04:35:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from relay.ipaccess.com [217.204.123.74]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DWBy7-00086R-00; Thu, 12 May 2005 04:35:07 -0700
Received: from magrat.ipaccess.com ([172.28.0.6])
by relay.ipaccess.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1DWBy2-00007l-F5
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 12 May 2005 11:35:02 +0000
Received: from aragorn.ipaccess.com
([172.28.0.78] helo=aragorn ident=mail)
by magrat.ipaccess.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1DWBxy-0005Vz-00; Thu, 12 May 2005 11:34:58 +0000
Received: from [172.28.0.128] (helo=[127.0.0.1])
by aragorn with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1DWBxy-0004KO-00; Thu, 12 May 2005 11:34:58 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Anton Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: After the last update Via C3 systems give assertion failed in ld.so at
boot
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 11:39:23 +0000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-21
Severity: critical
After the last update C3 Version 1
with a kernel 2.6 image will fail on boot with:
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: do_rel.h: 109 elf_dynamic_do_rel: Assertion
'(map->l_info[(34+0+(0x6ffffff - (0x6ffffff0)))] != ((void *0))' failed!
Tested with the following 2.6 images:
older 2.6.10-1-386 (subversion 2),
current 2.6.10-1-386 (subversion 10)
whatever the debian installer tries to put on the system when booted
with 2.6 - most likely
current 2.6.10-1-386
2.6.9 (686 config altered to optimize for 386).
with the default 2.4.18 image from woody will boot normally
with 2.6.10-2 and 2.6.9 will boot normally if the libc6 is 2.3.2.ds1-20 or
earlier.
I am looking at the changelog for ds1-21 and so far I have no idea what could
have caused it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.18-bf2.4
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7 The Berkeley database routines [gl
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 308792-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 May 2005 20:00:41 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 13 13:00:41 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from nevyn.them.org [66.93.172.17] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DWgKt-0001Ki-00; Fri, 13 May 2005 13:00:39 -0700
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DWgKr-0005Fw-Bd; Fri, 13 May 2005 16:00:37 -0400
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 16:00:37 -0400
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Anton Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#308792: After the last update Via C3 systems give assertion
failed in ld.so at boot
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 08:59:02PM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Problem ended up being hardware.
>
> The VIAs were trying to drive a not very up-to-spec (possibly 66Mhz)
> IDE 80 wire ribbon cable at 133 MHz (or 100Mhz on CMD). The system in
> question was marginal before the update and all 2.4 kernels do not
> drive the disk subsystem as aggressively as 2.6. The same cable worked
> perfectly fine on Intel 815e.
>
> You can close this one.
Thanks.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
