On 15/10/07 at 08:33 -0400, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote: > Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > On 11/05/07 at 11:02 -0400, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote: > > > >> I do not agree with the removal and find the suggestion of it a slap in > >> the face for the time spent trying to work with upstream to get the > >> licensing issues that would allow the fix to be done. > >> > > > > Hi Jeremy, > > > > The bugs about thoose license issues have been quiet for a very long > > time (since November 2005). If the situation has evolved, and you expect > > a change soon, it could be a good idea to document that in the bug logs. > > > > Thank you, > > > At this point I'm abandoning all hope that upstream will make any > effort to correct the issue. There appears to be no interest in > upstreams part to even respond and continually just passes it off as not > their problem. Consider any PHP Licensed PEAR module package currently > with a bug due to licensing abandoned and ideal candidate for complete > removal from the distribution unless someone with more free time on > their hands cares to adopt them. > > I've tried to get responses from upstream but the attempts were > useless and a waste of my time.
Arg. is there some place (besides -legal@) where coordination could take place about this issue? -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
