Your message dated Thu, 12 May 2005 19:32:15 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308869: fixed in elinks 0.10.4-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 May 2005 21:10:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 12 14:10:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-77-228.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.77.228] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DWKxI-000797-00; Thu, 12 May 2005 14:10:52 -0700
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.50) 
          id 1DWKxG-0004dC-EU
          for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 12 May 2005 23:10:50 +0200
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 23:10:50 +0200
From: Adeodato =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sim=F3?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: elinks: 0.10.4-5 compiled against libc6 in experimental
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-No-CC: Please respect my Mail-Followup-To header
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
        HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: elinks
Version: 0.10.4-5
Severity: serious
Tags: sid

Hello,

  the latest version of elinks and elinks-lite have been compiled
  against the experimental package of libc6, thus making them
  uninstallable in sid. A binary-NMU for i386 should suffice to fix
  this.

  Thanks.

--=20
Adeodato Sim=F3
    EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
=20
=46rom the moment I picked your book up until I put it down I was
convulsed with laughter. Some day I intend reading it.
                -- Groucho Marx


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 308869-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 May 2005 23:51:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 12 16:51:23 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DWNSd-0001yu-00; Thu, 12 May 2005 16:51:23 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DWNA7-0007RW-00; Thu, 12 May 2005 19:32:15 -0400
From: Peter Gervai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#308869: fixed in elinks 0.10.4-6
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 19:32:15 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: elinks
Source-Version: 0.10.4-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
elinks, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

elinks-lite_0.10.4-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/elinks/elinks-lite_0.10.4-6_i386.deb
elinks_0.10.4-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/elinks/elinks_0.10.4-6.diff.gz
elinks_0.10.4-6.dsc
  to pool/main/e/elinks/elinks_0.10.4-6.dsc
elinks_0.10.4-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/elinks/elinks_0.10.4-6_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Peter Gervai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated elinks package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 01:12:46 +0200
Source: elinks
Binary: elinks-lite elinks
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.10.4-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Peter Gervai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Peter Gervai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 elinks     - advanced text-mode WWW browser
 elinks-lite - advanced text-mode WWW browser (lite version)
Closes: 308869
Changes: 
 elinks (0.10.4-6) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Recompile w/libc6 in sid (closes: #308869)
   * Added autotools-dev in build-deps and try to update
     basic autoconf files to support other archs
Files: 
 e3cd0c0ca3d853fca95e6b56202cf5de 812 web optional elinks_0.10.4-6.dsc
 d639db96963fc42059c525cb1dce2060 25116 web optional elinks_0.10.4-6.diff.gz
 0f5912b8cfdd59fa8242dc048848816b 1324478 web optional elinks_0.10.4-6_i386.deb
 0dcb3805dcc73ba897cb36672fc94a28 671278 web optional 
elinks-lite_0.10.4-6_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Use finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] or ask a key server

iD8DBQFCg+WTpxQ7cGWSgT0RAvZmAJ0Xy647Zwfxuce8e+2Gs1jaHi8LJQCdGyKt
lxFKvoAE6eJwiJIJBsZ+0os=
=8YXp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to