Your message dated Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:26:24 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has caused the Debian Bug report #443451, regarding balsa: Links to a GPL library and to OpenSSL to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) Jeffrey Stedfast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---Hello Jeffrey, I got the following request, could you have a look at it? ----- Forwarded message from Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 22:06:45 +0200 From: Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] clone 443451 -1 severity -1 wishlist reassign -1 gmime2.2 found -1 2.2.10-1 block 443451 with -1 stop Hi, balsa links against OpenSSL and gmime2.2; it would be nice if gmime2.2 allowed linking to OpenSSL as a special exception. Do you think gmime could be relicensed in such a way? From #443451: On Fri, Sep 21, 2007, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: > Although balsa allows linking to OpenSSL, libgmime does not and it is > GPL, not LGPL. So, balsa should not link to both gmime and openssl. Thanks, -- Loïc Minier ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
