severity 307571 important tags 307571 unreproducible moreinfo thanks On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 03:57:54PM -0300, Goedson Teixeira Paixao wrote: > > Unfortunately, I don't seem to be able to reproduce this bug on my sarge > > system with gnomebaker 0.3-3, so I'm unable to confirm why your updated > > snapshot fixes the bug. Without that, I don't think it's a good idea to > > push in an updated package, containing various other changes (including UI > > changes).
> Unfortunately, I was not able to reproduce the bug. Alexander (the guy who > submitted the bug) tried the updated snapshot and told me it fixes the bug for > him. Besides this, I and many other Debian and Ubuntu users have been using > this snapshot for some time with reportedly more stability than the current > 0.3 code, so I decided to upload it and see if it could enter Sarge. > > Do you really consider this bug release-critical? Since it seems to only > > crash for one person, I'm not sure I agree. > I'm also not sure if it is release-critical or not. I believe it would be a > matter of how large a fraction of our users experience this bug. But it may be > that only one of the people who experienced decided to report the bur, or even > seeing it was already reported didn't bother saying "me too". So, I don't know > if the fact of only one user talking about the bug means only one user is > affected by it. There were some similar comments in the ubuntu forums, so the > number of users affected may be larger. > But i agree with you, if it's only one user, we may consider this as not > release-critical. Ok, I think the correct course of action is to downgrade this bug for now, until we know it's happening to more than one person and can figure out why. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
