Your message dated Thu, 12 May 2005 15:48:51 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308287: fixed in weechat 0.1.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 07:02:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 00:02:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from abordeaux-253-1-65-120.w82-125.abo.wanadoo.fr (debian) 
[82.125.99.120] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DV2Hc-00071j-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 00:02:28 -0700
Received: by debian (Postfix, from userid 1004)
        id 9E3D893CDC; Mon,  9 May 2005 09:01:57 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
From: Damien CASSOU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Depends on weechat-gtk (0.1.1-1) which can't be installed
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.11
Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 09:01:57 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: weechat
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Hi,

weechat can't be installed because of weechat-gtk.

The following packages contain unsatisfied dependencies :
   weechat: Depends: weechat-gtk (=3D 0.1.1-1) but it is not installable
E: Erroneous packages

Les paquets suivants contiennent des d=E9pendances non satisfaites=A0:
  weechat: D=E9pend: weechat-gtk (=3D 0.1.1-1) mais il n'est pas installa=
ble
E: Paquets d=E9fectueux

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=3DISO-8859-15) =
(ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 308287-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 May 2005 19:50:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 12 12:50:12 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DWJhE-0001sX-00; Thu, 12 May 2005 12:50:12 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DWJfv-0006J1-00; Thu, 12 May 2005 15:48:51 -0400
From: Julien Louis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#308287: fixed in weechat 0.1.1-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 15:48:51 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: weechat
Source-Version: 0.1.1-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
weechat, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

weechat-common_0.1.1-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/w/weechat/weechat-common_0.1.1-2_all.deb
weechat-curses_0.1.1-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/w/weechat/weechat-curses_0.1.1-2_i386.deb
weechat_0.1.1-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/w/weechat/weechat_0.1.1-2.diff.gz
weechat_0.1.1-2.dsc
  to pool/main/w/weechat/weechat_0.1.1-2.dsc
weechat_0.1.1-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/w/weechat/weechat_0.1.1-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Julien Louis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated weechat package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 22:38:52 +0200
Source: weechat
Binary: weechat-common weechat-curses weechat
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.1.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sebastien Helleu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Julien Louis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 weechat    - Fast, light and extensible IRC client
 weechat-common - Common files for WeeChat
 weechat-curses - Fast, light and extensible IRC client
Closes: 308287
Changes: 
 weechat (0.1.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/control:
     - Add myself to uploaders.
     - Remove unecessary dependency on weechat-gtk (Closes: #308287).
Files: 
 e3dde7b87d4d21bfd9ca63f40cd42bdd 718 net optional weechat_0.1.1-2.dsc
 68db16807c561f9841c000d8e6cad772 2039 net optional weechat_0.1.1-2.diff.gz
 d267083eac32d004c0cb89c32bd9f797 64088 net optional 
weechat-common_0.1.1-2_all.deb
 813ad37c2cf53fa7ed61b25dea24f413 810 net optional weechat_0.1.1-2_all.deb
 f86f5156ccfb8a40fd644552e43ac643 104186 net optional 
weechat-curses_0.1.1-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCg6sxpGK1HsL+5c0RAvI3AJwM8KCGEJ7CawhBZkeb1SVVcQdb2QCgrcaK
5nXR8Si9qB+5XmwchS05iVk=
=A46a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to