On Fri, Oct 05, 2007, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: > Once again (and it'll be my last answer on this fixed bug reported), the > bug was only 7 days old, and the proposed NMU was broken. > Moreover, I'm not the fuse maintainer, if you don't like my work and > think you're better, go ahead and add yourself to fuse uploaders.
As far as I know, it is 0-day NMU policy for bugs older than one week. I sponsored it to the DELAYED queue. I know the rules. I applied them. It seems you don't know all of them. If the patch was broken, I am sorry for that: I am the one responsible. But I also let you ( == Bartosz *and* you) some time to "wake up" and take action. Would it kill you either to say "sorry for being aggressive and thank you for taking care of the package"? OK, you're not the official maintainer. But why are you a comaintainer if you don't want to maintain the package? Wouldn't it be better to have it orphaned if the "real" maintainer is not active and to seek someone interested in the package? I am sure there are people who feel concerned with fuse. Anyway, thanks for trying to maintain the package the best you can and please also try not to take NMUs personnally. -- Mohammed Adnène Trojette
